Trump declares opioid epidemic a national emergency: What it means - USASIGHT

USASIGHT

NYC Events

Monday 14 August 2017

Trump declares opioid epidemic a national emergency: What it means


Americans consume a reported 80 percent of the world’s opioid supply despite being only 4.6 percent of the global population. (Yahoo News photo illustration; photos: iStockphoto/Getty Images, Getty Images, AP[2])

Michael Walsh
Reporter
Americans consume a reported 80 percent of the world’s opioid supply despite being only 4.6 percent of the global population. (Yahoo News photo illustration; photos: iStockphoto/Getty Images, Getty Images, AP[2])
President Trump declared the opioid epidemic a national emergency during a media event at his private golf club in New Jersey on Thursday.
­­
Two days after vowing to win the fight against the opioid epidemic, Trump was asked if he thinks the opioid crisis is an emergency and, if so, why he hasn’t declared it one yet.
“The opioid crisis is an emergency, and I’m saying officially right now: It is an emergency. It’s a national emergency,” he said at the Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, N.J. “We’re going to spend a lot of time, a lot [of] effort and a lot of money on the opioid crisis.”
This off-the-cuff remark is not enough to mobilize disaster relief money to regions dealing with the crisis. But Trump said the documents required to make his declaration official are forthcoming, describing the crisis as “a serious problem, the likes of which we have never had.”
“You know, when I was growing up they had the LSD and they had certain generations of drugs,” he continued. “There’s never been anything like what’s happened to this country over the last four or five years.”
A week earlier, the White House Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis, which the president established by executive order on March 29, had recommended that Trump declare a national emergency.
“Your declaration would empower your Cabinet to take bold steps and would force Congress to focus on funding and empowering the executive branch even further to deal with this loss of life,” wrote the commission, which is headed by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. “It would also awaken every American to this simple fact: If this scourge has not found you or your family yet, without bold action by everyone, it soon will. You, Mr. President, are the only person who can bring this type of intensi­ty to the emergency and we believe you have the will to do so and to do so immediately.”


President Trump with New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie at a White House meeting about opioid and drug abuse, March 29. (Photo: Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images)

The National Emergencies Act of 1976 authorizes the president to declare a national emergency that will activate special powers granted by other federal statutes. The law does not provide any emergency authority of its own.
In this case, the commission advised that Trump invoke the Public Health Service Act or the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.
The Public Health Service Act was enacted in 1944 to stop the introduction and spread of transmittable diseases from other countries to the United States. It was amended many times over the years to address a host of health issues, including drug abuse.
The Stafford Act, which was signed into law in 1988, amending the Disaster Relief Act of 1974, helped to establish a system for providing federal natural disaster assistance, especially FEMA programs, to state and local government.
National emergencies are typically declared in the aftermath of a national disaster or terrorist attack rather than a long-term health crisis. The specifics about what resources will be mobilized to help fight the epidemic were not immediately clear.
According to Duhaime’s Law Dictionary, though the Constitution secured presidential authority for declaring national emergencies, there was no process on the books for ending one until the 1970s.
In the case of U.S. v. Bishop, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit noted that U.S. presidents had declared national emergencies in 1933, 1950, 1970 and 1971 but none was ever revoked. Therefore, the court said, a “national emergency must be based on conditions beyond the ordinary. Otherwise it has no meaning.” As an example of something that does not qualify, the court said the long-term threat of the Soviet Union’s imperialistic ambitions does not validate placing the U.S. in “a constant state of national emergency.”
A young man shoots heroin in a park in the South Bronx section of New York City, June 7, 2017. (Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)



No comments:

Post a Comment